Is The Sting II Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, The Sting II is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:The Sting II is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Crime genre.
Answer: Maybe not, The Sting II is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 11, 2026
Released in 1983, The Sting II enters the Comedy genre with a narrative focused on Hooker and Gondorf pull a con on Macalinski, an especially nasty mob boss with the help of Veronica, a new grifter. Under the direction of Jeremy Kagan, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Jackie Gleason. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, The Sting II offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. The sharp editing keeps the narrative moving at a brisk pace, maximizing the impact of the key sequences.
Beyond the narrative, The Sting II resonates with current cultural themes in the Comedy space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of early 2026, The Sting II is available in theaters worldwide. For audiences in the US, UK, and India, digital rentals are typically available on platforms like Amazon Video roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release.
The plot of The Sting II centers on a unique premise within the Comedy landscape. Hooker and Gondorf pull a con on Macalinski, an especially nasty mob boss with the help of Veronica, a new grifter. They convince this new victim that Hooker is a somewhat dull boxer who is tired of taking dives for Gondorf. There is a ringer. Lonigan, their victim from the first movie, is setting them up to take the fall. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 1983 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of The Sting II has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a The Sting II sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for The Sting II (1983): with an audience rating of 4.7/10, the reception has been negative. It is a recommended for fans of Comedy, Crime cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $6,347,072 |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.7/10, and global collection metrics, The Sting II stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1983 cinematic year.
The Sting II is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.7/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.7/10, The Sting II may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
The Sting II may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
The Sting II is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.7/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.7/10, The Sting II may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
The Sting II may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
The Sting II is a Comedy, Crime movie that follows: Hooker and Gondorf pull a con on Macalinski, an especially nasty mob boss with the help of Veronica, a new grifter. They convince this new victim that Hooker is a somewhat dull boxer who is tired of t...
Yes, The Sting II is generally suitable for family viewing as it is a Comedy, Crime movie.
The Sting II is primarily available in its original language, with subtitles and dubbed versions available on various streaming services and digital stores.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full FranchiseHooker and Gondorf pull a con on Macalinski, an especially nasty mob boss with the help of Veronica, a new grifter. They convince this new victim that Hooker is a somewhat dull boxer who is tired of taking dives for Gondorf. There is a ringer. Lonigan, their victim from the first movie, is setting them up to take the fall.
**We can almost say that any similarity with the first “Sting” is a pure coincidence.** I loved the first film, but when I saw that there had been a sequel, I was suspicious: normally, they are always much weaker than the originals. And so it was! This film is nothing more than a pale shadow of its predecessor. It attempts to follow up the story of the con artists from the first film, with a script set four to five years later, however it is a much weaker, disjointed, conventional and predictable story. It's not really worth summarizing: suffice it to say that the crooks are back to avenge a comrade who was killed. The cast is completely different from the original film, and that was one of the first red flags for me, even before the start. If the first film was a nest of first-rate artists like Robert Shaw, Robert Redford or Paul Newman, this film relies on weaker actors because the first ones didn't want to return to the project. And my red flags raised higher when I saw that it was another director, Jeremy Kagan. I don't know him, but I wasn't impressed with his work here. When we talk about the actors, the best we have is Jackie Gleason. He's not great, but he does a good job, with commitment and some talent, that deserves a very positive note. Mac Davis is much less successful, not going much beyond average. The same can be said of Karl Malden and Teri Garr, who do not shine in their roles. It's very little and doesn't meet the expectations at all, especially those of the public who saw the original film. Technically, the film shines due to its cinematography, good color and initial credits, which are a nod to the original film. This was very enjoyable and gave the film a really nice family comedy feel. I also liked most of the sets and costumes, as well as the period recreation. The problem is the soundtrack. If the first film used intelligently a series of melodies by Scott Joplin, one of the great composers in vogue at the time, this film was completely unable to do a similar exercise. However, the original soundtrack made by Lalo Schiffrin was good enough to deserve an Oscar nomination. The only nomination, which is still another bad note if we consider that the first film was nominated ten times and “cleaned” the auditorium by taking seven statuettes.