To (1964) movie backdrop
To (1964) movie poster
⭐ Rating5/10
🎯 Verdict AVERAGE
👍 Good
  • Engaging Storyline
  • Strong Performances
👎 Bad
  • Pacing issues in mid
  • Predictable ending
196485 minComedy
Audience VerdictAVERAGE

To

To Movie Hit or Flop?

FLOP

Verdict:To is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.

With a rating of 5.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy genre.

Is To Worth Watching?

Answer: Maybe not, To is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.

It features a runtime of 85 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

5.02 votes
85Minutes
1964Release Year
Visual Story
Advertisement

To Review

Last updated: January 13, 2026

🎬 Detailed Premise & Narrative Foundations

Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1964, To emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of In this romantic drama, Niels (Jens Osterholm) is a petty thief and irresponsible lout who meets Lone (Yvonne Ingdal), a hospital lab assistant who is just the opposite of Niels. Unlike standard genre fare, To attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.

The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Palle Kjærulff-Schmidt, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Comedy elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.

🎭 Cast Performances: A Masterclass in Character Study

The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and To features a noteworthy lineup led by Yvonne Ingdal. Supported by the likes of Jens Østerholm and Jørgen Bidstrup, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.

Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Yvonne Ingdal, Jens Østerholm, Jørgen Bidstrup manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1964 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Comedy space.

🎥 Directorial Vision & Technical Craftsmanship

From a technical perspective, To is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.

Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.

📜 Narrative Pacing & Structural Integrity

The structure of To follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 85 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.

Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.

🌍 Cultural Impact & Global Resonance

Beyond its immediate entertainment value, To resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Comedy landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.

This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 5/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.

📖 Plot Breakdown & Philosophical Subtext

Analyzing the plot deeper, To is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. In this romantic drama, Niels (Jens Osterholm) is a petty thief and irresponsible lout who meets Lone (Yvonne Ingdal), a hospital lab assistant who is just the opposite of Niels. The two meet, fall in love, and must learn the old adage that opposites attract. The unenviable Niels and the model citizen Lone are helpless to fight their passionate chemistry when they are together.

The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.

💡 Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?

In summary, our editorial assessment of To (1964) is overwhelmingly divisive. With an audience rating of 5/10 and strong performance metrics in the Comedy categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.

Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Yvonne Ingdal, Jens Østerholm, Jørgen Bidstrup or the visual majesty of its technical execution, To is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1964. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.

Where to Watch To Online?

Streaming Hub

📺 Stream on

Nordisk Film+Nordisk Film+

🎟️ Rent on

Apple TVApple TV
Google Play MoviesGoogle Play Movies
SF AnytimeSF Anytime

🏷️ Buy on

Apple TVApple TV
Google Play MoviesGoogle Play Movies
SF AnytimeSF Anytime

Parents Guide & Age Rating

Not Rated
To has not been officially rated yet.

Final Verdict

Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5/10, and global collection metrics, To stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1964 cinematic year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is To movie hit or flop?

To has received mixed reviews with a 5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.

Is To worth watching?

To is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy movies, but read reviews first.

Where can I watch To online?

To is currently available for streaming on Nordisk Film+. You can also check for it on platforms like Nordisk Film+ depending on your region.

Explore More Verdicts

Expert Consensus
Live Rating
MOVIEMX
★ 5.0
To
<a href="https://moviemx.in/review/to-269053" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;"><div style="background:#121212;border:1px solid #f5c518;border-radius:12px;padding:15px;width:180px;text-align:center;font-family:sans-serif;box-shadow:0 10px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><div style="color:#f5c518;font-size:10px;font-weight:900;letter-spacing:2px;">MOVIEMX</div><div style="color:white;font-size:28px;font-weight:900;margin:8px 0;">★ 5.0</div><div style="color:#888;font-size:12px;font-weight:500;">To</div></div></a>

Share this rating on your blog or website. Includes a 100% organic backlink.

Synopsis

In this romantic drama, Niels (Jens Osterholm) is a petty thief and irresponsible lout who meets Lone (Yvonne Ingdal), a hospital lab assistant who is just the opposite of Niels. The two meet, fall in love, and must learn the old adage that opposites attract. The unenviable Niels and the model citizen Lone are helpless to fight their passionate chemistry when they are together.