Verdict:Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction, Action, Adventure genre.
Answer: Yes, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 150 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 10, 2026
Released in 2009, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen enters the Science Fiction genre with a narrative focused on Sam Witwicky leaves the Autobots behind for a normal life. Under the direction of Michael Bay, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Peter Cullen. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen offers a competent presentation. The cinematography aligns well with the tone, though the pacing during its 150-minute runtime can feel deliberate.
As of January 2026, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is available in theaters worldwide. For streaming audiences in the US and UK, look for availability on major platforms roughly 45 days after the theatrical release. Check your local listings for specific showtimes.
With an audience rating of 6.2/10, the reception has been divisive. For fans of Science Fiction, Action, Adventure, it serves as a worthy addition to the watchlist.
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $200,000,000 |
| Worldwide Gross | $836,303,693 |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is $200,000,000. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.2/10, and global collection metrics, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2009 cinematic year.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen has received mixed reviews with a 6.2/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Science Fiction, Action, Adventure movies, but read reviews first.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is a Science Fiction, Action, Adventure movie that Sam Witwicky leaves the Autobots behind for a normal life. But when his mind is filled with cryptic symbols, the Decepticons target him and he is drag...
So "Sam" (Shia LaBeouf) reckons after his first death-defying dose of mechanised shenanigans, that he is done with all things "Autobot" and so looks forward to settling down at college with "Mikaela" (Megan Fox). Nope, not to be. He keeps having dreams, and vivid, mysterious, dreams that feature mysterious writings? Just like with the first outing of this franchise, the story drags the young couple into a battle between the "Autobots" and their foes, the "Decepticons" only this time the rehash of the hidden power-cube story tries to immerse itself in ancient Egyptian mythology as a means of making the never ending assemble/disassemble/reassemble fight scenes emerge as something less repetitive and, frankly, dull. There isn't really a script to speak of, and at 2½ hours this really does feel like you could have actually built one of the pyramids in the time it takes to come to what is the inevitable tee for another sequel. John Turturro steals his scenes as the ultra-hammy agent "Simmons" and we have Josh Duhamel as the eye-candy in an uniform but as with the first film, Fox is as wooden as a skateboard. Although there is pretty much non-stop action throughout, I still couldn't tell who is fighting with whom nor is "Bumblebee" getting any better at the close protection game. One for die hard fans, I think - it certainly left me yawning.
'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen' is much like the original for me, in that I never got hooked into what was being portrayed in front of my eyes; I was more just processing the events, rather than actually absorbing anything. Don't get me wrong, neither flicks are bad, just not good in my opinion. I personally have a hard time differentiating all of the robots, even main dude Optimus Prime. Their designs aren't eye-catching to me, I don't feel like I'm looking at anything other than metal and tiny little light up eyes. The wall-to-wall action doen't help either, what with them just clattering into each other constantly. With that said, the aforementioned carnage does help in regards to the pacing and run time. 150 minutes is way too long, though to be honest it flows well for a movie of that length and I was never desperate for the end credits to arrive. I just wasn't properly enjoying myself at any point. Shia LaBeouf works, a competent and well chosen lead no doubt. Megan Fox really is only there to look beautiful though, eh? No dislike directed at Fox at all, more so at those responsible for the lack of tangible character development offscreen. The rest of the cast are alright, Tyrese Gibson is quite underused though. The voice cast are slightly better than those behind LaBeouf/Fox. I watched that first film just over five years ago, I hadn't realised until recently that they had made seven (!) of them; plus that bonus one last year. As if I'm going to watch them al... of course I am. I'm bound to like at least one, right?
