Is Treasure of Ruby Hills Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Treasure of Ruby Hills is likely a skip if you enjoy Western movies.
It features a runtime of 71 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Treasure of Ruby Hills is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Western genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Treasure of Ruby Hills is likely a skip if you enjoy Western movies.
It features a runtime of 71 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 11, 2026
Released in 1955, Treasure of Ruby Hills enters the Western genre with a narrative focused on Ranchers battle one another over water rights. Under the direction of Frank McDonald, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Zachary Scott. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Treasure of Ruby Hills offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. The sharp editing keeps the narrative moving at a brisk pace, maximizing the impact of the key sequences.
Beyond the narrative, Treasure of Ruby Hills resonates with current cultural themes in the Western space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of early 2026, Treasure of Ruby Hills is available for streaming on fuboTV. It is also featured on platforms like Troma NOW. For audiences in the US, UK, and India, digital rentals are typically available on platforms like Amazon Prime and Apple TV roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release.
The plot of Treasure of Ruby Hills centers on a unique premise within the Western landscape. Ranchers battle one another over water rights. Western. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 1955 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of Treasure of Ruby Hills has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a Treasure of Ruby Hills sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for Treasure of Ruby Hills (1955): with an audience rating of 4/10, the reception has been negative. It is a recommended for fans of Western cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
fuboTV
Troma NOWAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4/10, and global collection metrics, Treasure of Ruby Hills stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1955 cinematic year.
Treasure of Ruby Hills is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4/10, Treasure of Ruby Hills may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Treasure of Ruby Hills is currently available for streaming on fuboTV. You can also check for it on platforms like fuboTV, Troma NOW depending on your region.
Treasure of Ruby Hills is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4/10, Treasure of Ruby Hills may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Treasure of Ruby Hills is currently available for streaming on fuboTV. You can also check for it on platforms like fuboTV, Troma NOW depending on your region.
Treasure of Ruby Hills is a Western movie that follows: Ranchers battle one another over water rights. Western....
Treasure of Ruby Hills is classified as Western. We recommend checking the official age rating before watching with children.
Treasure of Ruby Hills is primarily available in its original language, with subtitles and dubbed versions available on various streaming services and digital stores.
Ranchers battle one another over water rights. Western.
No reviews found for this filter.