Is Valparaiso Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Valparaiso is likely a skip if you enjoy movies.
It features a runtime of 20 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Valparaiso is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Valparaiso is likely a skip if you enjoy movies.
It features a runtime of 20 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 13, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2016, Valparaiso emerges as a significant entry in the Cinema domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Rocio is 20 years old and has been detained in an identification and expulsion center in Rome, pending deportation to her country of origin. Unlike standard genre fare, Valparaiso attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Carlo Sironi, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Film elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.
The success of any Film is often anchored by its ensemble, and Valparaiso features a noteworthy lineup led by Manuela Martelli. Supported by the likes of Marco Felli and Laura Rovetti, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Manuela Martelli, Marco Felli, Laura Rovetti manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 2016 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Cinema space.
From a technical perspective, Valparaiso is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Valparaiso follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 20 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.
Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Valparaiso resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Film landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 0/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.
Analyzing the plot deeper, Valparaiso is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. Rocio is 20 years old and has been detained in an identification and expulsion center in Rome, pending deportation to her country of origin. During her detention Rocio has become pregnant, but she is unwilling to reveal how or with whom this has happened, preferring to remain silent. By law, pregnant women cannot be detained. So Rocio is released, four months into her pregnancy and with a temporary permit of stay on maternity grounds. Now she is free, but must also go ahead with an unwanted pregnancy.
The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Valparaiso (2016) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 0/10 and strong performance metrics in the Cinema categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Manuela Martelli, Marco Felli, Laura Rovetti or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Valparaiso is a significant contribution to the cinema of 2016. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Valparaiso stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2016 cinematic year.
Valparaiso is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Valparaiso may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Valparaiso may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Rocio is 20 years old and has been detained in an identification and expulsion center in Rome, pending deportation to her country of origin. During her detention Rocio has become pregnant, but she is unwilling to reveal how or with whom this has happened, preferring to remain silent. By law, pregnant women cannot be detained. So Rocio is released, four months into her pregnancy and with a temporary permit of stay on maternity grounds. Now she is free, but must also go ahead with an unwanted pregnancy.