Videodrome
Performance & Direction: Videodrome Review
Last updated: February 15, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Videodrome (1983) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.3/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Videodrome features a noteworthy lineup led by James Woods . Supported by the likes of Debbie Harry and Sonja Smits , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Videodrome
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1983, Videodrome is a Horror, Science Fiction, Mystery film directed by David Cronenberg. The narrative crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving James Woods.
Story Breakdown
The horror unfolds through carefully crafted atmosphere and escalating dread. As the president of a trashy TV channel, Max Renn is desperate for new programming to attract viewers. When he happens upon "Videodrome," a TV show dedicated to gratuitous torture and punishment, Max sees a potential hit and broadcasts the show on his channel. However, after his girlfriend auditions for the show and never returns, Max investigates the truth behind Videodrome and discovers that the graphic violence may not be as fake as he thought. Director David Cronenberg uses both psychological terror and visceral scares, building tension through what's unseen as much as what's shown. The pacing allows for breathing room between scares, making each frightening moment more effective.
Narrative Structure
- Opening Hook: An unsettling prologue sets the ominous tone, hinting at the terror to come while establishing the rules of this world.
- Character Arc: The main character shows growth throughout the story, though some supporting characters could have been more fully realized. James Woods's arc is present but occasionally predictable.
- Climax & Resolution: The final act escalates the terror to its peak, forcing characters to confront the source of horror directly.
Thematic Depth
Beneath the scares lies commentary on deeper fears like loss of control, the unknown, or societal anxieties manifested as literal monsters.
What Works & What Doesn't
✅ Strengths
- Solid execution of genre conventions
- Engaging moments that showcase the creators' vision
- Competent performances from the cast
⚠️ Weaknesses
- Some narrative choices that feel predictable
- Occasional pacing lulls in the middle act
Ending Explained: Videodrome
Ending Breakdown: Directed by David Cronenberg, Videodrome resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes involving James Woods, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Videodrome reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Videodrome?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Horror films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of James Woods or the director
- Want a few scares and creepy atmosphere
Box Office Collection: Videodrome
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $6.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $2.1M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
Videodrome Budget
The estimated production budget for Videodrome is $6.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: Videodrome
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Videodrome Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Amazon VideoVideodrome Parents Guide & Age Rating
1983 AdvisoryWondering about Videodrome age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Videodrome is 88 minutes (1h 28m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.3/10, and global performance metrics, Videodrome is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1983 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Videodrome worth watching?
Videodrome is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 7.3/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Videodrome parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Videodrome identifies it as R. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Videodrome?
The total duration of Videodrome is 88 minutes, which is approximately 1h 28m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Videodrome
How Videodrome Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Videodrome
"Max" (James Woods) runs a television channel that specialises in adult content. Always on the look out for new and more innovative and shocking content, he stumbles upon a brief series of satellite images that tantalise him. It's on a television talk show that he meets "Nicki" (Debbie Harry) who has a penchant for sex with a twist - and that not only turns them both on, but furthers his desire to obtain his newly found (and pretty violent) content for his Channel 83 output. The other guest on that show is the renowned "Prof. Oblivion" (Jack Creley) who prognosticates that one day the reality of television and video will replace the "real" reality. These threads slowly all tie together when "Nicki" decides that she is going to star in this new "Videodrome" enterprise and "Renn" must now reconcile his concern for her safety with his mounting need to acquire the show. This film is surreal and bizarre and yet it's still quite effective at illustrating the most visceral aspects of human nature - sex, venality, lust - even pain; and the visual effects (particularly towards the last fifteen minutes) must have been particularly effective. It's a bit on the sordid side - not that that's necessarily a bad thing, but at times the seaminess of it all is distracting from the more interesting and provocative aspects of the narrative. Time hasn't been very kind to it either, the effects have lost much of their potency now and the acting is mediocre at best. It is well worth a watch, but I'm not sure that will be the case for very much longer.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
