Is Wolfman Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Wolfman is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Wolfman is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 2.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Wolfman is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 11, 2026
Released in 1979, Wolfman enters the Horror genre with a narrative focused on A man finds out that his family has a werewolf curse put upon them. Under the direction of Worth Keeter, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Earl Owensby. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Wolfman offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. The sharp editing keeps the narrative moving at a brisk pace, maximizing the impact of the key sequences.
Beyond the narrative, Wolfman resonates with current cultural themes in the Horror space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of early 2026, Wolfman is available in theaters worldwide. For audiences in the US, UK, and India, digital rentals are typically available on platforms like Amazon Prime and Apple TV roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release.
The plot of Wolfman centers on a unique premise within the Horror landscape. A man finds out that his family has a werewolf curse put upon them. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 1979 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of Wolfman has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a Wolfman sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for Wolfman (1979): with an audience rating of 2.4/10, the reception has been negative. It is a recommended for fans of Horror cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 2.4/10, and global collection metrics, Wolfman stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1979 cinematic year.
Wolfman is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 2.4/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 2.4/10, Wolfman may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Wolfman may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Wolfman is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 2.4/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 2.4/10, Wolfman may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Wolfman may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Wolfman is a Horror movie that follows: A man finds out that his family has a werewolf curse put upon them....
Wolfman falls under Horror, which often contain intense scenes. Parental discretion is advised.
Wolfman is primarily available in its original language, with subtitles and dubbed versions available on various streaming services and digital stores.
A man finds out that his family has a werewolf curse put upon them.
_**Old-fashioned werewolf flick by a do-it-yourself filmmaker**_ In 1910, a traveling heir (Earl Owensby) returns to his family’s estate in North Carolina after his father’s death, but becomes suspicious of what went down while learning of a family curse linked to a satanic priest (Ed Grady). Sid Rancer is on hand as a helpful doctor. “Wolfman” (1979) had a limited release in Southern states and is comparable to a Hammer flick of the 60s, but the writing & acting aren’t as finely tuned (because that takes money) and the sluggish story is easily 15 minutes too long; plus don’t expect horror icons like Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee or even Andrew Keir. This was writer/director Worth Keeter’s feature film debut. Although the movie’s low-budget, it has good Gothic horror ambiance with fitting music. Keeter shows that he’s a competent filmmaker in a do-it-yourself way, but sometimes the modest budget betrays itself. The quaint werewolf make-up & effects are decidedly old-fashioned with the hairy beast resembling Spain’s renowned Paul Naschy. In just a couple years hits “The Howling” and “An American Werewolf in London” would forever raise the bar for werewolf movies. Whilst short/stocky Owensby is serviceable as the protagonist, don’t expect the caliber of Oliver Reed in “The Curse of the Werewolf” (1961). On the positive side, Kristina Reynolds is stunningly beautiful and a good actress to boot. Too bad Keeter didn’t do more with her. At the end of the day, “Wolfman” fills the bill for if you’re in the mood for Hammer-esque full moon horror AS LONG AS you don’t mind the limitations of low-budget Indie productions, including parts that drag, like the sequence where the protagonist digs up a grave. Personally, I appreciated the depictions of life in a small Eastern town in the early 1900s with the corresponding mood of Victorian horror. The film runs 1 hour, 42 minutes, and was shot in Shelby, North Carolina, which is about a half-hour drive west of Charlotte. GRADE: C
Now, this is a real shocker of a film.... Earl Owensby "Colin Glasgow" arrives at the estate of his wealthy late father. He inherits just about everything, but the will requires him to hang about for a few weeks to look after his creepy family. Upon closer inspection, it is apparent that his father was murdered; the document has been forged and his evil family aided by a wicked Satanic priest are working a curse that causes "Colin" to slowly become the "Wolfman". The acting is rotten; the screenplay as bad - and the special effects are the stuff of 1960's "Dr. Who" with plenty of horse hair, maniacal laughing, wobbly soft focus candles and wild church organ music. Don't bother...