Is A Cricket in Times Square Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1973)

📖 The Core Premise

A Cricket in Times Square returns to the screen in 1973, bringing a fresh narrative to the Animation, Comedy, TV Movie genre. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "Chester Cricket gets trapped inside a picnic basket and transported from his home in Connecticut to the middle of New York City. Alone and lost, he meets up with Harry and Tucker, a cat and mouse that have somehow become friends, and with Mario, a young boy who works with his father at a Times Square newsstand. When it's discovered that Chester can play songs he hears from the radio just by rubbing his legs, people begin to come from all around to listen. Though Chester is happy with his new-found friends, he will eventually have to say good-bye and return to his home."

🎬 Performance & Direction

A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Mel Blanc shines in a role that demands both nuance and gravitas, elevating the material significantly. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Animation. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.

🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)

Is A Cricket in Times Square worth your time? If you appreciate Animation, Comedy, TV Movie films that take risks, this is likely a must-watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.

🏆 Final Verdict

Ultimately, A Cricket in Times Square is a solid addition to the genre. With a runtime of 26 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.

Our recommendation: Definitely Watch.