Aleksandr Parkhomenko backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Aleksandr Parkhomenko.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Aleksandr Parkhomenko Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1942)

About the life and heroic death of the old Bolshevik-Lugansk resident, participant in the civil war, Aleksandr Yakovlevich Parkhomenko. In 1918, capturing Ukraine, the German occu...

✨ The Quick Verdict

SKIP IT

If you are a fan of War, Drama, History cinema, then Aleksandr Parkhomenko offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1942 landscape.

👥 Target Audience

Fans of War films
Fans of Drama films
Fans of History films
casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

📖 The Core Premise

Aleksandr Parkhomenko stands as a 1942 entry that attempts to leave its mark on the War, Drama, History landscape. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "About the life and heroic death of the old Bolshevik-Lugansk resident, participant in the civil war, Aleksandr Yakovlevich Parkhomenko. In 1918, capturing Ukraine, the German occupiers sought to use the Haidamaks, the White Guards and the Greens in their struggle. By order of Voroshilov, Aleksandr Parkhomenko from Lugansk arrives in Tsaritsyn. At the same time, the Germans launched an active offensive. The "red" battalions are poorly armed, however, Parkhomenko manages to raise them to the attack and put the enemy to flight."

🎬 Performance & Direction

A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Unfortunately, Semyon Goldshtab feels underutilized in a role that lacks depth. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good War. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.

🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)

Is Aleksandr Parkhomenko worth your time? If you appreciate War, Drama, History films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.

🏆 Final Verdict

Ultimately, Aleksandr Parkhomenko misses the mark on several fronts. With a runtime of 107 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.

Our recommendation: Skip It.

⏳ Time Investment

107MIN

At approximately 1.8 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.