Profit & Loss Analysis
Is An Oral History of: The Name of the Rose Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2022)
An oral history of the 1986 film adaptation of "The Name of the Rose", gathering together the memories of several members of the surviving cast/crew....
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of cinema, then An Oral History of: The Name of the Rose offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2022 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
📖 The Core Premise
An Oral History of: The Name of the Rose stands as a 2022 entry that attempts to leave its mark on the various landscape. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "An oral history of the 1986 film adaptation of "The Name of the Rose", gathering together the memories of several members of the surviving cast/crew."
🎬 Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Unfortunately, F. Murray Abraham feels underutilized in a role that lacks depth. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good cinema. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is An Oral History of: The Name of the Rose worth your time? If you appreciate various films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.
🏆 Final Verdict
Ultimately, An Oral History of: The Name of the Rose misses the mark on several fronts.
With a runtime of 150 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Skip It.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 2.5 hours, the film requires a significant time commitment.