Is Bulging Jockstraps Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1987)

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1987, Bulging Jockstraps represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Modern Cinema category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Remember when porno films were called "educational films"? Well, Bulging Jockstraps, part documentary, part embarrassment of riches for jockstrap fetishists, could actually be classified as educational. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Modern Cinema are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Remember when porno films were called "educational films"? Well, Bulging Jockstraps, part documentary, part embarrassment of riches for jockstrap fetishists, could actually be classified as educational. The first few minutes covers the history of athletic supporters in great detail, with some awesome vintage advertisements and images of models in obsolete "suspensory bandages". The rest is a virtual kaleidoscope of hung hotties in every conceivable kind of jockstrap. Some masturbate, others suck and fuck, and a few perform amazing feats like twisting their cocks and balls with the jockstrap so that they appear as engorged pretzels."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The presence of Bob May provides a necessary level of professionalism to the production, even when the underlying script struggles to maintain a consistent tone. It is a testament to their skill that they remain the most engaging element of the film.

The direction by David White is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 83 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Bulging Jockstraps truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Modern Cinema, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Bulging Jockstraps explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1987 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and David White respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Bulging Jockstraps is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Bob May or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Bulging Jockstraps is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.