Profit & Loss Analysis
Is Colophon Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2015)
A child with a bleeding nose, sitting at the window in a bus and his young father whose nose is bleeding too. The young father tries to wipe the blood from the childβs nose, but be...
β¨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of cinema, then Colophon offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2015 landscape.
π₯ Target Audience
π Detailed Analysis
π¬ The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
Debuting in 2015, Colophon represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Modern Cinema category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A child with a bleeding nose, sitting at the window in a bus and his young father whose nose is bleeding too. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Modern Cinema are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A child with a bleeding nose, sitting at the window in a bus and his young father whose nose is bleeding too. The young father tries to wipe the blood from the childβs nose, but because his own nose is bleeding too, It keeps on dripping on his shirt, and whenever he tries to wipe his own blood away, the same happens to the little boy β not about this is the Film. In the Film can be seen a Boy, a Girl, a Dog, a Boat and a River β and all this through a prism of tears in different geometric shapes."
π Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. While the script occasionally leans into familiar territory, the efforts of Tim Oliver Schultz ensure that the emotional beats of Colophon always land with sufficient weight. Tim Oliver Schultz provides a steady, reliable performance that anchors the film through its narrative shifts.
The direction by Alexandre Koberidze is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 22 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
π€ Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Colophon truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Modern Cinema, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
βοΈ Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Colophon explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2015 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Alexandre Koberidze respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
π Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Colophon serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Tim Oliver Schultz or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Colophon is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
β³ Time Investment
At approximately 0.4 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.