Is Doctor Who: State of Decay Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1980)
Still trapped in E-Space, the Doctor, Romana, Adric and K9 encounter a medieval civilisation dominated by the Three Who Rule, vampires who govern from their mighty castle....
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Science Fiction, Adventure, TV Movie cinema, then Doctor Who: State of Decay offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 1980 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
📖 The Core Premise
Doctor Who: State of Decay stands as a 1980 entry that attempts to leave its mark on the Science Fiction, Adventure, TV Movie landscape. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "Still trapped in E-Space, the Doctor, Romana, Adric and K9 encounter a medieval civilisation dominated by the Three Who Rule, vampires who govern from their mighty castle."
🎬 Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. The performance by Tom Baker is a highlight, bringing a palpable intensity to the screen. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Science Fiction. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is Doctor Who: State of Decay worth your time? If you appreciate Science Fiction, Adventure, TV Movie films that take risks, this is likely a must-watch. It stands out as one of the stronger entries of 1980, offering enough depth to satisfy critical viewers while remaining accessible to casual audiences.
🏆 Final Verdict
Ultimately, Doctor Who: State of Decay is a solid addition to the genre.
With a runtime of 96 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Definitely Watch.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.6 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.