
Is Fish in a Barrel Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1977)
Young robber, son of a prostitute who had killed herself, gets involved with two police informers, who force him to share the loot he gets....
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Crime cinema, then Fish in a Barrel offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 1977 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
📖 The Core Premise
Fish in a Barrel returns to the screen in 1977, bringing a fresh narrative to the Crime genre. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "Young robber, son of a prostitute who had killed herself, gets involved with two police informers, who force him to share the loot he gets."
🎬 Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Stepan Nercessian shines in a role that demands both nuance and gravitas, elevating the material significantly. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Crime. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is Fish in a Barrel worth your time? If you appreciate Crime films that take risks, this is likely a must-watch. It stands out as one of the stronger entries of 1977, offering enough depth to satisfy critical viewers while remaining accessible to casual audiences.
🏆 Final Verdict
Ultimately, Fish in a Barrel is a solid addition to the genre.
With a runtime of 110 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Definitely Watch.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.8 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.