Getting It On backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Getting It On.

View Review →
★ WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Getting It On Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1983)

An ordinary sex-starved teenager and his friends start secretly video recording high school girls and their activity irks the community, as well as their principal....

✹ The Quick Verdict

SKIP IT

If you are a fan of Comedy cinema, then Getting It On offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1983 landscape.

đŸ‘„ Target Audience

✓ Fans of Comedy films
✓ casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

🎬 The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

In the evolving tapestry of Comedy cinema, the 1983 release of Getting It On stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into An ordinary sex-starved teenager and his friends start secretly video recording high school girls and their activity irks the community, as well as their principal. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Comedy are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "An ordinary sex-starved teenager and his friends start secretly video recording high school girls and their activity irks the community, as well as their principal."

🎭 Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Martin Yost does an admirable job with the material provided, but one can't help but feel that a more daring directorial approach would have yielded a more impactful result. It is a competent but ultimately standard genre performance.

The direction by William Olsen is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 96 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

đŸ€” Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Getting It On truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Comedy, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 2.9/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

⚖ Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Getting It On explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1983 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and William Olsen respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

🏆 Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Getting It On is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Martin Yost or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Getting It On is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

⏳ Time Investment

96MIN

At approximately 1.6 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.