Is Glitter Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1983)
Following the death of his father, painfully shy David Preston finds himself pressed into duty as new chairman at the Glitter advertising agency. This is a task he's clearly not up...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Comedy cinema, then Glitter offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1983 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
🎬 The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
Glitter, a standout production of 1983, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Comedy landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Following the death of his father, painfully shy David Preston finds himself pressed into duty as new chairman at the Glitter advertising agency. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Comedy are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Following the death of his father, painfully shy David Preston finds himself pressed into duty as new chairman at the Glitter advertising agency. This is a task he's clearly not up to as brow-beating bitchy exec "MS." Benson can't resist pointing out when they first meet."
🎭 Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The presence of Shauna Grant provides a necessary level of professionalism to the production, even when the underlying script struggles to maintain a consistent tone. It is a testament to their skill that they remain the most engaging element of the film.
The direction by Roberta Findlay is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 80 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
🤔 Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Glitter truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Comedy, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 4.5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
⚖️ Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Glitter explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1983 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Roberta Findlay respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
🏆 Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Glitter is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Shauna Grant or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Glitter is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.3 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.