Profit & Loss Analysis

Is Goal III: Taking on the World Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2009)
Mexican footballer Santiago Muñez, along with his best friends and England national team players Charlie Braithwaite and Liam Adams, are selected for their respective national team...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Drama cinema, then Goal III: Taking on the World offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2009 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
📖 The Core Premise
Goal III: Taking on the World stands as a 2009 entry that attempts to leave its mark on the Drama landscape. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "Mexican footballer Santiago Muñez, along with his best friends and England national team players Charlie Braithwaite and Liam Adams, are selected for their respective national teams at the 2006 FIFA World Cup Finals in Germany."
🎬 Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. JJ Feild attempts to elevate the material, but the direction leaves them with little to work with. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Drama. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is Goal III: Taking on the World worth your time? If you appreciate Drama films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.
🏆 Final Verdict
Ultimately, Goal III: Taking on the World misses the mark on several fronts.
With a runtime of 91 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Skip It.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.5 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.