Is Guilty Pleasures Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1997)
Two beautiful women who live in the same apartment building each have a shocking story to tell. On the first floor lives Silvia Resino (Alexandra Paulhiac), who has three psychotic...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Horror, Mystery, Thriller cinema, then Guilty Pleasures offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1997 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
📖 The Core Premise
With the release of Guilty Pleasures (1997), audiences are invited back into the world of Horror, Mystery, Thriller. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "Two beautiful women who live in the same apartment building each have a shocking story to tell. On the first floor lives Silvia Resino (Alexandra Paulhiac), who has three psychotic admirers while on the second floor, RoseMarie Curtis (Sasha Graham) is descending into madness after joining an insane acting school."
🎬 Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Sasha Graham attempts to elevate the material, but the direction leaves them with little to work with. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Horror. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is Guilty Pleasures worth your time? If you appreciate Horror, Mystery, Thriller films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.
🏆 Final Verdict
Ultimately, Guilty Pleasures misses the mark on several fronts.
With a runtime of 105 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Skip It.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.8 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.