RATING★ 2.0
WORTH IT? NO
Number 96 backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Number 96.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Number 96 Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1974)

Further adventures of the "Number 96" (1972) crew, on the big screen....

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

SKIP IT

If you are a fan of cinema, then Number 96 offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1974 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Number 96, a standout production of 1974, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Modern Cinema landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Further adventures of the "Number 96" (1972) crew, on the big screen. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Modern Cinema are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Further adventures of the "Number 96" (1972) crew, on the big screen."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Despite the inherent talent of Rebecca Gilling, the performance in Number 96 feels somewhat constrained by a narrative framework that doesn't fully exploit their range. There are flashes of brilliance, but the overall impact is muted.

The direction by Peter Benardos is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 113 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Number 96 truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Modern Cinema, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 2/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Number 96 explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1974 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Peter Benardos respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Number 96 is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Rebecca Gilling or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Number 96 is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

⏳ Time Investment

113MIN

At approximately 1.9 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement