Is Of Pure Blood Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1986)
A mother investigating her son's mysterious death finds much more than she bargained for. Casting director Alicia Browning (Remick) takes leave of her job in NYC to investigate wha...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Drama cinema, then Of Pure Blood offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1986 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
📖 The Core Premise
Of Pure Blood stands as a 1986 entry that attempts to leave its mark on the Drama landscape. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "A mother investigating her son's mysterious death finds much more than she bargained for. Casting director Alicia Browning (Remick) takes leave of her job in NYC to investigate what happened to her son Mark (Browning) in Germany. Her persistence uncovers perplexing details that lead to the discovery of some very unsettling, and dark personal memories!"
🎬 Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Lee Remick attempts to elevate the material, but the direction leaves them with little to work with. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Drama. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is Of Pure Blood worth your time? If you appreciate Drama films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.
🏆 Final Verdict
Ultimately, Of Pure Blood misses the mark on several fronts.
With a runtime of 120 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Skip It.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 2.0 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.