Is The Lesser Caucasus - Between Mount Ararat and the Caspian Sea Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2016)

📖 The Core Premise

The Lesser Caucasus - Between Mount Ararat and the Caspian Sea stands as a 2016 entry that attempts to leave its mark on the Documentary landscape. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "The mountain worlds of the Caucasus mark the border between Europe and Asia. The film shows the species and landscape diversity of the lesser Caucasus in Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan. Shielded from the main ridge of the Greater Caucasus, a thermophilic flora and fauna has been able to develop there. For the first time, the land bridge between Europe and Persia is portrayed comprehensively: From the mountains of Dagestan to the canyons of the Caspian Basin and to biblical Mount Ararat."

🎬 Performance & Direction

A movie's success often hinges on its execution. The performance by Hans Henrik Wöhler is a highlight, bringing a palpable intensity to the screen. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Documentary. The cinematography and score further amplify the experience, creating a truly immersive atmosphere.

🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)

Is The Lesser Caucasus - Between Mount Ararat and the Caspian Sea worth your time? If you appreciate Documentary films that take risks, this is likely a must-watch. It stands out as one of the stronger entries of 2016, offering enough depth to satisfy critical viewers while remaining accessible to casual audiences.

🏆 Final Verdict

Ultimately, The Lesser Caucasus - Between Mount Ararat and the Caspian Sea is a solid addition to the genre. With a runtime of 48 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.

Our recommendation: Definitely Watch.