
Is The Name of a River Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2002)
During the 1947 partition of Bengal, a man and a woman cross a river to begin life anew. Their journey manifests many roles against the backdrop of some horrific events and loss of...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Drama cinema, then The Name of a River offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2002 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
📖 The Core Premise
The Name of a River returns to the screen in 2002, bringing a fresh narrative to the Drama genre. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "During the 1947 partition of Bengal, a man and a woman cross a river to begin life anew. Their journey manifests many roles against the backdrop of some horrific events and loss of life."
🎬 Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Supriya Choudhury attempts to elevate the material, but the direction leaves them with little to work with. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Drama. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is The Name of a River worth your time? If you appreciate Drama films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.
🏆 Final Verdict
Ultimately, The Name of a River misses the mark on several fronts.
With a runtime of 84 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Skip It.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.4 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.