Profit & Loss Analysis
Is The Prophet of the Fields Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1947)
After the war, Gábor Erőss, released from its captivity, returns home. Abandoned by his love, he finds his house ruined. Nikita, his neighbour, and the roaming Levite come to his a...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Drama cinema, then The Prophet of the Fields offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1947 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
📖 The Core Premise
The Prophet of the Fields returns to the screen in 1947, bringing a fresh narrative to the Drama genre. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "After the war, Gábor Erőss, released from its captivity, returns home. Abandoned by his love, he finds his house ruined. Nikita, his neighbour, and the roaming Levite come to his assistance by offering him both their friendship and a draught animal."
🎬 Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Unfortunately, Eva Bartok feels underutilized in a role that lacks depth. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Drama. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is The Prophet of the Fields worth your time? If you appreciate Drama films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.
🏆 Final Verdict
Ultimately, The Prophet of the Fields misses the mark on several fronts.
With a runtime of 84 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Skip It.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.4 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.