The Right to Live backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for The Right to Live.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is The Right to Live Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1933)

A shady financier tries to acquire a new chemical...

✨ The Quick Verdict

SKIP IT

If you are a fan of Crime cinema, then The Right to Live offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1933 landscape.

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Crime films
casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

📖 The Core Premise

The Right to Live returns to the screen in 1933, bringing a fresh narrative to the Crime genre. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "A shady financier tries to acquire a new chemical"

🎬 Performance & Direction

A movie's success often hinges on its execution. Davy Burnaby attempts to elevate the material, but the direction leaves them with little to work with. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Crime. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.

🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)

Is The Right to Live worth your time? If you appreciate Crime films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.

🏆 Final Verdict

Ultimately, The Right to Live misses the mark on several fronts. With a runtime of 68 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.

Our recommendation: Skip It.

⏳ Time Investment

68MIN

At approximately 1.1 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.