Profit & Loss Analysis
β
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified
Is This So-Called Disaster Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2003)
Director Michael Almereyda's documentary on the weeks just prior to Sam Shepard's stage production of his play "The Late Henry Moss."...
β¨ The Quick Verdict
SKIP IT
If you are a fan of Documentary cinema, then This So-Called Disaster offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2003 landscape.
π₯ Target Audience
β Fans of Documentary films
β casual viewers seeking light entertainment
π Detailed Analysis
π The Core Premise
This So-Called Disaster stands as a 2003 entry that attempts to leave its mark on the Documentary landscape. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "Director Michael Almereyda's documentary on the weeks just prior to Sam Shepard's stage production of his play "The Late Henry Moss.""
π¬ Performance & Direction
A movie's success often hinges on its execution. In This So-Called Disaster, even the presence of Sean Penn struggles to save a script that feels disjointed. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Documentary. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.
π€ Why You Should Watch (or Skip)
Is This So-Called Disaster worth your time? If you appreciate Documentary films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.
π Final Verdict
Ultimately, This So-Called Disaster misses the mark on several fronts.
With a runtime of 89 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.
Our recommendation: Skip It.
β³ Time Investment
89MIN
At approximately 1.5 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.