Is Timeline: The History of WWE – 1963-1969 – As Told By Bruno Sammartino Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2013)

📖 The Core Premise

Timeline: The History of WWE – 1963-1969 – As Told By Bruno Sammartino returns to the screen in 2013, bringing a fresh narrative to the Documentary genre. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "In early 1963, Toots Mondt and Vincent J. McMahon seceded from the governance of the NWA to form the WWWF. Shortly thereafter they would crown their champion and hang the fortune of their venture on him. That man will be your guide for a journey back to 1963 and the formative years of the WWWF up through 1969. Bruno Sammartino was selling out houses all across the northeast and was privy to all the inner workings of the company."

🎬 Performance & Direction

A movie's success often hinges on its execution. The performance by Bruno Sammartino is a highlight, bringing a palpable intensity to the screen. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Documentary. The cinematography and score further amplify the experience, creating a truly immersive atmosphere.

🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)

Is Timeline: The History of WWE – 1963-1969 – As Told By Bruno Sammartino worth your time? If you appreciate Documentary films that take risks, this is likely a must-watch. It stands out as one of the stronger entries of 2013, offering enough depth to satisfy critical viewers while remaining accessible to casual audiences.

🏆 Final Verdict

Ultimately, Timeline: The History of WWE – 1963-1969 – As Told By Bruno Sammartino is a solid addition to the genre. With a runtime of 145 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.

Our recommendation: Definitely Watch.