Is Underexposed: A Women's Skateboarding Documentary Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2013)

📖 The Core Premise

With the release of Underexposed: A Women's Skateboarding Documentary (2013), audiences are invited back into the world of Documentary. At its heart, the film explores complex themes wrapped in a compelling storyline. As the plot unfolds, we see characters navigating a world where stakes are high. "Professional skateboarder Amelia Brodka examines the skateboarding industry's approach to how it markets, promotes and supports women in its sport."

🎬 Performance & Direction

A movie's success often hinges on its execution. In Underexposed: A Women's Skateboarding Documentary, even the presence of Amelia Brodka struggles to save a script that feels disjointed. The direction aims to balance pacing with character development, a hallmark of good Documentary. While there are moments of brilliance, the pacing occasionally dips.

🤔 Why You Should Watch (or Skip)

Is Underexposed: A Women's Skateboarding Documentary worth your time? If you appreciate Documentary films that take risks, this is likely a decent one-time watch. However, if you are looking for a flawless masterpiece, you might find some plot points predictable.

🏆 Final Verdict

Ultimately, Underexposed: A Women's Skateboarding Documentary misses the mark on several fronts. With a runtime of 86 minutes, it asks for a significant time investment, but for the right audience, it pays off.

Our recommendation: Skip It.