Verdict:In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 3.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure, Fantasy, Drama, Action genre.
Answer: Maybe not, In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 11, 2026
Released in 2011, In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds enters the Adventure genre with a narrative focused on Granger, an ex-Special Forces soldier gets thrown back to medieval times to fulfill an ancient prophecy. Under the direction of Uwe Boll, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Dolph Lundgren, Lochlyn Munro, Natassia Malthe. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. The sharp editing keeps the narrative moving at a brisk pace, maximizing the impact of the key sequences.
Beyond the narrative, In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds resonates with current cultural themes in the Adventure space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of January 2026, In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is available in theaters worldwide. For streaming audiences in the US, UK, and India, look for availability on major platforms roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release. Don't miss the high-definition experience provided by premium large format (PLF) screenings.
The plot of In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds centers on a unique premise within the Adventure landscape. Granger, an ex-Special Forces soldier gets thrown back to medieval times to fulfill an ancient prophecy. Venturing through the now war torn Kingdom of Ehb, he teams up with an unlikely band of allies with the goal of slaying the leader of the "Dark Ones". Fighting against all odds, they must free the land from the grasp of the evil tyrant Raven and save the world. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 2011 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds (2011): with an audience rating of 3.9/10, the reception has been negative. It is a recommended for fans of Adventure, Fantasy, Drama, Action cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $4,500,000 |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is $4,500,000. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 3.9/10, and global collection metrics, In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2011 cinematic year.
In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 3.9/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 3.9/10, In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is a Adventure, Fantasy, Drama movie that Granger, an ex-Special Forces soldier gets thrown back to medieval times to fulfill an ancient prophecy. Venturing through the now war torn Kingdom of...
In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 3.9/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 3.9/10, In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is a Adventure, Fantasy, Drama movie that Granger, an ex-Special Forces soldier gets thrown back to medieval times to fulfill an ancient prophecy. Venturing through the now war torn Kingdom of...
In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds is a Adventure, Fantasy, Drama movie. Please check the content rating before watching with family.
You can find streaming options and availability for In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds on popular platforms. Check movieMx for the latest updates and reviews.
In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds features a talented cast. Check our "Top Cast" section to see the full list of actors and the characters they play in this film.
The runtime and duration of In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds are available in the movie details section. It's a gripping story that keeps you engaged from start to finish.
**Fight... to get to the end of the movie.** After having managed to find some redeeming values in the first film, “In the Name of The King: a Dungeon Siege Tale”, I decided to also give its sequel a chance, also directed by Uwe Boll and, I thought, a likely sequel worthy of the first movie. However, the production was fatally injured by the brutal budget cut, perhaps due to the reception that the first film received from the public. These considerations do not, however, clear the director of his own weaknesses. Boll may not be a complete incompetent, I still don't know him well enough to evaluate him, but I've already realized from these two films that he's not particularly brilliant. The script takes us back to the kingdom of Ehb, and the events surrounding the crown of that fantasy kingdom, when a former US Special Forces soldier is accidentally sent there. The whole story is weak, artificial, and the way the characters act is very silly and unnatural. In fact, the characters are mere figures and faces without any personality and about whom we know little and care even less. There are some attempts at action, but I believe that even the original video game is more exciting and intense than what we're given here. The cast is led by Dolf Lundgreen, an actor I don't particularly like and who is far from what I would consider a versatile and skilled professional. He might even be, but in the hands of a director capable of extracting that from him. The actor has no difficulty taking on the role, not least because he seems to be almost the only minimally experienced professional around, but his performance is very weak. Lochlyn Munro, who should be someone more prominent, is not capable of being more imposing than a fifteen-year-old teenager on the first date. The rest of the cast, and especially the actresses, don't even deserve to be mentioned. Amateurism is a nice term to describe what they did. Technically, we have to lament the Franciscan poverty of what is offered to us: the cuts that the production budget suffered necessarily implied cost reductions, which may explain why everything seems as fake as a theater play: from the costumes to the armament and props, the film is a Carnival from which only the sets and filming locations can be saved, chosen with care or created in CGI with competence. There is a lot of CGI here, including a dragon, and there is some investment in these resources, perhaps due to lack of budget to go further. The cinematography makes the best of these elements, but you never feel the confidence, confidence and ingenuity that the cinematography of the original film allowed the audience to exude. The soundtrack works very well, but it doesn't have the interest or sound of the one used in the first film.